Dragon Ball Yaoi Hard

The Silence of the lambs

WT Saturn Devouring His Children

The Silence of the lambs

It had been 15 years since the reckless abandon dogma to ban vaccines, because these qualified as a demonic practice, when the Watch Tower returned to the fray with a new madness: the ban's Witnesses-organ transplants to be classified as a cannibalistic practice, as medical therapy to save their lives. The new light became official between Jehovah's Witnesses the November 15, 1967 when it was published in the United States of America in its flagship magazine, The Watchtower ( WT), p. 702; in English was published six months later, on April 15, 1968, pages 254-256). The magazine said

Questions From Readers

● Is there any Scriptural objection to donating one’s body for use in medical research or to accepting organs for transplant from such a source?—W. L., U.S.A.

[...]

Humans were allowed by God to eat animal flesh and to sustain their human lives by taking the lives of animals, though they were not permitted to eat blood. Did this include eating human flesh, sustaining one’s life by means of the body or part of the body of another human, alive or dead? No! That would be cannibalism, a practice abhorrent to all civilized people . Jehovah clearly made a distinction between the lives of animals and the lives of humans, mankind being created in God’s image, with his qualities. (Gen. 1:27) This distinction is evident in His next words. God proceeded to show that man’s life is sacred and is not to be taken at will, as may be done with the animals to be used for food. To show disrespect for the sanctity of human life would make one liable to have his own life taken.—Gen. 9:5, 6.

When there is a diseased or defective organ, the usual way health is restored is by taking in nutrients. The body uses the food eaten to repair or heal the organ, gradually replacing the cells. When men of science conclude that this normal process will no longer work and they suggest removing the organ and replacing it directly with an organ from another human, this is simply a shortcut. Those who Such submit to Operations Are Malthus living off the flesh of Another human. That is cannibalistic. However, in Allowing a man to eat animal flesh Jehovah God did not granted permission for Humans to try to perpetuate Their Lives by Taking Into Their onesies cannibalistically human flesh, whether in the form Chewed or Organs of whole body or parts taken from Others.

A monstrous and irrational teaching can only come from ignorant people in science and abject in the moral sense. The Watch Tower has always despised college. Speaking of academic members of the Governing Body of Witnesses: In the period 1967-1980, there was not a single medical doctor, indeed, not even there was only one university degree, some of them even had the graduate school. What scientific credibility could be condemning a group of uneducated medical therapy such as organ transplants? What theological credibility could have those before 1921 allowed the vaccine, then the banned until 1952, and then finally again allowed?

As was the case with vaccines, advances in medical science ridiculous quickly left the position of the Watch Tower as after the great fiasco of 1975 loomed image changes and washes.

The disregard for life of his parishioners was again exposed when silent for five years after, in mid-1975, suspected of a "blunder" committed similar to the vaccine. With the exception of a reference in 1978 on an "arteriovenous fistula" in hair transplantation, the latest criticism of the transplants was the September 1, 1975, in The Watchtower, page 519.

The change was made effective after the publication of the "new light" in the Watchtower magazine, 1980, English edition, September 15, page 31, section "Question From Readers":

Should I take action the congregation if a baptized Christian accept the transplantation of a human body, such as the cornea or a kidney? Today, other sincere Christians would say that the Bible does not definitively rule out medical transplants of human organs ... The congregation judicial committee would not take disciplinary action if someone accepted an organ transplant . How

of 1980, why no announcement was made in 1976 and thus prevent some Witnesses and unconditional obedience to lose their lives by refraining from transplants healers? If I waited for more favorable circumstances (even very recent failure was prophetic doomsday prediction for the year 1975), that place is respect for the lives of others? By the way, apologies for raising false expectations in 1975 took the same time coming, these were published in the same issue of the journal in which they lifted the ban on organ transplants.

What kind of conscience intentioned waits five years to better times, knowing that many witnesses will die by failing organ transplants? What Christian morality plays for five years with the memory and life of the faithful in order to hide their mistakes and prophetic interpretation of the Bible? Would you trust your life and interests to subjects in their political strategies include sacrifices human? Another delay

similar happened with the doctrine of "refrain" from making social service (in lieu of military service). According to testimony from Raymond Franz (former member of the Governing Body) in his book "Crisis of Conscience", pages 114-115, the Governing Body in 1978 realized that the service does not violate any biblical principle and therefore could make alternative service and have a good reputation before the congregation. At its meeting of October 11, 1978, thirteen members present, nine voted in favor of changing the traditional rule to the decision whether to accept alternative service leave to the conscience of the individual, four voted no. The result? Because at that time the total membership of the "body" was sixteen, and nine was not a majority of two thirds, did not change. Finally, on May 1, 1996, stated that: If a Christian believes that the national civil service is a "good work" the elders and other brothers should respect his conscience. However, this uncertainty of the "body" of nearly eighteen years he made thousands of "Witnesses" were in prison unnecessarily .

Apparently the Holy Spirit took almost twenty years to convince two-thirds of their intimate collaborators. And I wonder: Why did the Holy Spirit failed to convince the four that voted against it?

Raymond Franz's silence.

Raymond Franz was among a group of miserable people who kept silent.

Franzistas Among states that the output of the Governing Body Franz RV was for reasons of conscience. False! Ray was forced to resign by default in the spring of 1980. This waiver is recognized by Raymond Franz in his book "Crisis" page 283:

April 14 [1980], a witness in New York named Joe Gould phoned the service department Brooklyn and spoke with Harley Miller, one of the five committee members of the Service Department. He told Miller that a coworker, a Cuban named Humberto Godinez, had told him a conversation that took place at home between him and a friend who was a member of the Bethel family. He said the family member of Bethel had been expressed regarding a number of points that differed from the teachings of the organization. Miller Gould recommended to seek the name Godinez member of the Bethel family. This was done and the name of Cris Sanchez was provided. Godinez also said my name and Ed Dunlap and Rene Vazquez had also emerged in the conversation.

Then we can conclude that the departure of Raymond Franz was induced and maintained by some colleagues, and rivals, the Governing Body that the evidence used supracitados to let out of the top leadership of the Watch Tower.

Since his stay in Central, Raymond Franz had ample opportunity to assert his Christian conscience or resign, let's see some of them:

1. 1972, there was no crisis of conscience.
   In September 1972, the Malawi Congress Party, the only political party in the country, issued a resolution requesting that stripped the Jehovah's Witnesses all their jobs, they were driven from their homes, and that Party members to carry out this matter were given government protection. As a result, broke another wave of horrible persecution. The Watch Tower
   induced a massacre in Malawi due to impose a standard of neutrality that Mexico did not suit them for political reasons. In Malawi does not accept a political card even knowing that would impact torture, rape or be killed, and in Mexico were allowed to pay bribes to officials to illegally obtain a military record .
   
   
2. 1975, there was no crisis of conscience.
   In that year the "End of the World" did not and the Governing Body chose to remain silent so that the brothers were slowly forgetting the prophetic fiasco. Finally in 1979 he decided to publish something like an apology, Raymond Franz explains, in his book "Crisis": took almost four years for the organization, through its administration finally admitted that he had been wrong, there was, for a decade, built up false hopes. Not that such a frank statement, although true, could be done. I know about this as I was assigned to write such a statement and, as in previous similar cases, had to abide, not by what they say I would have liked even by what he thought The brothers needed to hear, but that could be said and be approved by two thirds of the Governing Body when they were presented.
   
   
3. 1976, there was no crisis of conscience.
   As demonstrated by the literature from 1976 was resolved never to publish criticism of organ transplants. The Governing Body chose to remain silent even knowing that many brothers lose their lives to obey the mandate to refrain from transplants. On this dead silence, Franz refused to publish anything in his book "Crisis of Conscience."
   
   
4. 1980 March, there was no crisis of conscience. According to the book
   "Crisis", 14 April 1980, the tip of Joe Gould on certain confidential conversations revealed by Humberto Godinez started legal proceedings to which Ray called "Crisis of Conscience."
   
   
5. April 14, 1980, if there was "crisis" but not of consciousness.
   

Note, however, which was the subject of interviews that were made to Franz and his friends and that led to a forced resignation of the Governing Body:

1. May Jehovah has no organization on earth today and that its Governing Body is headed by Lord Sierro.
   
   
2. That all baptized since the time Christ (33 AD) onwards until the end should have the heavenly hope. All these must partake of the emblems at the Memorial, and not just those of the rest claim to be anointed.
   
   
3. That there is no proper arrangement of a kind of "faithful and discreet slave" composed of the anointed and Governing Body to direct the affairs of Jehovah's people. In Mat. 24:45 Jesus used this expression only as an illustration of the faithfulness of individuals. not need rules, you need only follow the Bible.
   
   
4. that no two classes today, the celestial and terrestrial class called "other sheep" in John 10:16.
   
   
5. The number of 144,000 mentioned in Rev. 7:4 and 14:1 is symbolic and is not to be taken literally. Those of the "great crowd" mentioned in Revelation 7:9 also serve in the sky as shown in verse 15 which states that that crowd used "day and night in His temple (Naos)" or K. Int says: "in the divine dwelling place of Him"
   
   
6. We are not living now in a special time of the "last days," but, rather, the "last days" began 1900 years ago for 33 d. AD as indicated by Peter in Acts 2:17 when he quoted the prophet Joel.
   
   
7. That 1914 is not a date. Jesus Christ was enthroned then but has been ruling in his kingdom from 33 d. JC That the presence of Christ (parousia) has not happened but it will be when the "sign of the Son of Man appears in heaven" (Matt. 24:30) in the future.
   
   
8. That Abraham, David and other faithful men of old will also have heavenly life, on the basis that view in Heb. 11:16. Sadly

in their allegations did not show up any of the villainy of the multiple fiascos prophetic about the end of the world, the greed of worldly goods of the Watch Tower, the practice of death social dissent, banning vaccines and organ transplants and blood transfusions, and the torture and killing of the brothers in Malawi by supporting a ban on military-political affiliation in Mexico did not apply. Strange consciousness that he woke up in 1980 following a complaint from others that appeared sensitive only to disputes glories and privileges mostly on terrestrial and celestial.

Raymond Franz in his book "Crisis of Conscience" published something that looks like an apology, but as I will explain, there seems to be neither sincere nor honest in

regret not being able to personally apologize to some which may have hurt one way or another, but my prayers are to the effect that it no lasting pain and hope in the providence of God in these perimeters that are beyond my power. I hope that in the remaining years of my life to see a measure of peace for my wife and me and also the blessing of God in our joint efforts to serve Him all our days. [...]



I am grateful to have been able make available information that I think others have the right to know . There is much more that could be said that perhaps needs to be said for the full picture. But whether the time, life and the 1st circumstances permitted or not, I'm content to let the results of the 1st has now been told to rest in the hands of God.

Mr Franz, surprised to hear him say "may have hurt" someone. Why do you say "maybe"? Also amazed that you have suggested that it provided all the information that others are entitled to know. If that's true Why you in his book "Crisis" speak no bans on vaccines and organ transplants and the concealment of child rapists? One thing is that you want to differentiate themselves from their former colleagues of the Governing Body and one that you are different from them, and truth, in the light of the evidence hardly see the difference: merchants all accessories, dishonest, cowardly and with their hands stained with blood.

His ethical inconsistency was exposed at the time you chose to profit from his books on his experiences in the Watch Tower, also when marketed it with a vital and necessary information for many Witnesses were freed from the clutches of the sect. Its "attachment to the business", much like the Watch Tower, not much seems to fit with the supposed consciousness "distressed" and "crisis" that you claim to have.

MORFEO, MADRID, 16 MARCH 2008

oOo

Sources:

Published by Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

1. Magazine The Watchtower Edition USA,
   1967, November 15, page 702,
   Questions From Readers: is there any Scriptural objection to Donating one's body for use in medical research or to Accepting Organs for transplant from Such a source? -WL, USA
   
   
2. Watchtower, English edition
   1968, April 15, pages 254-256,
   Readers Question: Is there any biblical objection to donating one's body to be use in medical research or accept organs for transplantation of such a source?
   
   
3. The Watchtower Journal, English edition
   1980, September 15, page 31,
   Questions from readers: Should the congregation to take action if a baptized Christian accepts the transplantation of a human body, like a cornea or a kidney? Magazine
   
4. The Watchtower, English edition
   1996, May 1, page 20,
   us pay to Caesar what is Caesar
   
   
5. Awake Magazine , English edition
   1973 February 8 page 29, observing the world
   : Persecution in Malawi.
   
   
6. manuals internal organization.
   

manuals internal organization

• a. Trained to be ministers, 1958. B.
• Organized to preach the Kingdom and make disciples, 1972. C.
• Organized to Accomplish Our Ministry, 1983 and 1989. D.
• Organized to do Jehovah's will, 2005.

Other publications outside the Watchtower:

1. Crisis of Conscience: The Internal Struggle Between Loyalty to God and Loyalty a religion, English edition, published by Commentary Press (1993).
   
   
2. Questions for Jehovah's Witnesses ,
   1983, William & Joan Cetnar.