Tuesday, February 24, 2009

How To Adjust A Truck Door

Ignorance is bliss


-Cifra:
"You know, I know this steak does not exist, I know that when I stick it in the mouth is the Matrix is \u200b\u200btelling my brain:" nice and juicy. "After nine years , you know what I realize? Ignorance is bliss. "

-Agent Smith:
"So we have a deal."

-Cifra:
"
not want to remember nothing, nothing, understand?" I want to be rich, do not know, someone important, like an actor. "

-Agent Smith:
"Whatever you want sr. Reagan."

(Dialogue between figure and Agent Smith - The Matrix)


Another similar dialogue.

-Cultist:
"You know, I know that the" organized religion "is a farce, I know when I go to the" Kingdom Hall "or" preaching from house to house "or echo money in" box contributions "(synonymous with 'brush') is the" Governing Body "(or Governing Body) that is telling my brain:" You're a good brother, you are generous and spiritual, you do the "right" and surely God will reward you. "Although some opponents informed say" ugly things "about the rough and uncertain past of Jehovah's Witnesses, never investigated his claims, but from hearsay I knew that before were taught other "truths" (as opposed to defending themselves now, so it could be crossed out of lies to one or other or both), not analyzed in depth doctrinal development, but knew of other failed dates the "end times" (such as 1914, 1925, 1975), I did not impute bad faith (and this despite the fact that they accused the brothers of being "impatient" and spread the rumor that the end was near), Furthermore, although we say that we rely on the Bible, today's date, I have not read the Bible independently essential task if I want to "try and ensure" that "I am the truth." After nine years, you know what I realize? Ignorance is bliss. "

-leader of the sect:
" So we have a deal. "

-Cultist:
" I do not think nothing, nothing at all, okay? and something else, I want to be popular, do not know, someone important, as a member of the Governing Body or at least a popular superintendent owner of a major company investment or pyramid selling (Afinsa, Network, Herbalife, More Life, etc.). .

-leader of the sect:
"Whatever you want sir 'Representative of the Most High God and King and Priest with Christ'."

(simulated dialogue between a cult and a leader of the sect Jehovah's Witnesses)
sectarian
Although they have more information today than at other times past, that does not mean they are wiser and more cautious and more aware of human society. It seems that the simplest (and comfortable), the most innovative (and enjoyable) has to be (necessarily) the "truth" true (not all truths are true). Have reduced the area of \u200b\u200binformation and certainty to what suits them at the time, either by proximity or by its simplicity or spectacular, or because he happened is all that can intoxicate his battered ego.

A sectarians do, too that figure, the Matrix character that despite his extensive and accurate knowledge rather stay anchored in appearances (and convenience) abandoning its fidelity to the truth. Prefers to be reinserted in a virtual world to satisfy their desires and not have to endure the daily hardships of reality that surrounds us.

Put another way: A "brotherhood" that the syrup, a status that make them feel useful and important to the accompanying illusion of a future eternal life in an "ideal world" could lead to a sectarian as well as "Matrix "To encrypt. For both mental state is pleasant and free of worries, oblivious to the responsibility to make their own decisions in this world, real, beautiful, but full of challenges and dangers.

which is Matrix is \u200b\u200btelling my brain: "nice and juicy"
is organized religion that is telling my brain: "You are good and important and you feel good, not need to worry, fight, or think for yourself "


MADRID, FEBRUARY 24, 2009

Friday, November 21, 2008

Quickbooks Pro 2009 License Hack

Thieves "without any shame? Manipulators "brazen?

Hacker trying to upload the video interview YouTube.
Apparently this act harms the interests of Commentary Pre $ $


I got!
To be informed about the dark dealings of the Watchtower
No need to pay Commentary Pre $ $!



Although we intend to be well-intentioned, honest and generous
our opponents see us as well of ugly!


Dear readers. The

Franzistas-to Esteban Lopez to head back to chide the good work of those who want to expose and denounce the activities of sects Lord! Now accused of brazen thieves and those who generously been placed on YouTube's video-interview with Raymond Franz, issued by TVE in 1996 in a program called "Line 900."

Mr. Esteban López, please tell us what is the problem? In his blog "Pieces of Hope", dated November 11, 2008, we answer: [...]


The English television interview conducted at Raymond Franz is very enlightening because it gave voice to someone who had been unfairly silenced for a long time unable to speak to the English-speaking public. English television journalist Julia Castelló at the time gave me a copy of the recorded interview and when someone was interested in seeing a copy myself responsible to a specialized company and mailed COD charging only expenses involved . [...]



is true that the interview has been added by others on YouTube, but must be clear that this was done without my permission and without Raymond Franz. Since the special files to be viewed on the Internet I did and I spent my money for it, the rest added in YouTube interviews are simply a blatant theft of property.
Customers
interview posted on YouTube without permission not only have shamelessly stolen, but the blatantly manipulated by assigning bad motives to Raymond Franz and discrediting your good name with the sole purpose of causing confusion.
the end is attached the full article, remove each their own conclusions.

not know the feelings that have prompted Don Esteban Lopez, famed ex-witness who lives in Barcelona (Spain), and unconditionally loyal acolyte of Raymond Franz and CEO of the publishing company Iberian Commentary Press. We do not speak prosecute based on what we do not know, however, it does explain why the authors of this blog contributed a foreign initiative for publication in the above YouTube video interview.

Simply put, it was a response to restrictions Commentary Press for free public access to the video interview. That Esteban Lopez called "charges" had implications for a monetary amount (as he himself recognizes) that far exceeded the cost of shipping doubled. This we all know who have had to pay Don Esteban Lopez to have a copy of the video interview. In order to estimate the cost of that service, add an explanation on how to duplicate a videotape of HSV: simply connect two VHS players in the first place the tape player to double and the second a blank tape, so easy. Cost if it were, with three euros more than it would have covered both the value of the VHS type video tape plus shipping. What was the final selling price? Well bordering a 1,000% (ten times the cost), namely 30 €, and that if we speak of cheaper selling price because we know that some paid even more.

Although the sale of videos is a lawful business activity and we assume Commentary Press said its sales to English Treasury (made known by the writer), the authors of this site seems immoral and unchristian-that trades with vital information that could free the sectarian yoke millions of unfortunates who remain in captivity-and-operated in the sect "Jehovah's Christian Witnesses" (religious name registered by the Watchtower, a leading multinational publisher.)

Following statements by Esteban Lopez on the intellectual property of Raymond Franz on the agenda were discussions with the producer, and this, he clarified that the transfer of the copy of the interview was provided exclusively for personal use Raymond Franz (and by proximity, Esteban Lopez) and that all rights of the interview are the property of the producer who made the program "Línea 900". Bone out that these statements, this undermines production Raymond Franz as a valid executive person to permit or restrict the viewing of the interview. What would such a producer if he is informed of the "Cash receipts of expenses" that Don Esteban Lopez practiced with those who request a duplicate of the tape to watch the interview? Maybe we should inform both TVE and the Treasury on that business in disguise. We'll see where it comes up with this ugly matter "!

These "revenue expenses" remained for many years. Fortunately, the technology would promote the release of this information. The Internet, bete noire of sects and sectarian allowed digital publication of a vast amount of information. How could it be otherwise, it's finally been remastered video interview in a digital format and uploaded to the Internet.

should clarify that this new resource is not up to the Internet for anyone to have it. Esteban Lopez put the video interview on its website under key (username and password). For a copy of the video were asked visitors to send an email to Esteban Lopez, after a few days he reported on conditions and how to acquire the video interview and while he inquired to give "explanations" of his interest, it informing him of the honey of a new religious community is rising (or New Religious Movement). Abstract: We used the need for information for proselytizing and trade (typical Commentary Press) stakeholders, finally, or had just bought a book, or video, or were recruited to "meet" in private forums or communities.

The authors of this blog again disapproved of this conduct unbecoming and interested. Finally, others applauded the initiative to publish the video interview on YouTube. Apparently, this "good work" has provoked the ire of the Franzistas, to the point of swearing such as "thieves" and "manipulative." That thieves more rare! Do not earn money, spend their time and resources and do not expect any compensation. Franzistas Gentlemen's see if they knew at once! This initiative pursued a single objective: the unconditional and free viewing of the video interview of Raymond Franz.

Now, Stephen says the following:
"Internet and YouTube portal represents a formidable opportunity for all who wished could see the interview with Raymond Franz without wasting time making copy after copy and send again and again by mail. So I decided to convert the original format VHS tape in a special file to be viewed on the internet. That I took some money but I felt that the benefit to others more than offset the effort ".
Stephen, there are things we do not understand: The video interview was in digital format since 2001 (it is possible that before, however, this is the date the undersigned may ratify).
  • Why have waited many years to publish freely on the Internet?

  • Why was jeered and / or reported to those who wanted to put it free on the Internet from 2001?

  • If the charge was because of the inappropriateness of the "Web site that hosts it." Why pages by Commentary Press or its delegate Iberian "Written for the Concordia" (currently "Thought and Culture") is offered free of charge early viewing of the video interview? Why have they waited until November 2008?
Please do not misunderstand us, the purpose of this paper is to clarify the facts and not the prosecution of any person or editorial. We understand that everyone can do with their "goods" and "past experience" that suits you. Take this opportunity to acknowledge that there is information, whether paid or unpaid.

If anyone wants to see the "corpus delicti", the video-entevista concerned, you can click on the following link:

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=33E00B95C02C4423

http://sectasytestigosdejehova.blogspot.com/2008/01/entrevista-raymond-franz-en-tve -1996.html

MORFEO, MADRID, NOVEMBER 22, 2008





About Raymond Franz's interview on YouTube

November 11, 2008 by Stephen

The English television interview conducted at Raymond Franz is very enlightening because it gave voice to someone who had been unjustly silenced for a long time unable to speak to the English-speaking public. English television journalist Julia Castelló at the time gave me a copy of the recorded interview and when someone was interested in seeing a copy myself responsible to a specialized company and mailed COD charging only expenses involved.

Internet and YouTube portal represents a formidable opportunity for all who wished could see the interview with Raymond Franz without wasting time making copy after copy and send it again and again by mail. So I decided to convert the original format VHS tape in a special file to be viewed on the internet. That cost me a lot of money but I felt that the benefit to others more than offset the effort.

always wanted the interview was not manipulated by anyone, although I recognize that that will always be difficult. So I would like to make clear that the only portal YouTube has the express permission of Raymond Franz for the interview to be seen is this: http://es.youtube.com/user/pensamientoycultura

is true that the interview has been added by others on YouTube, but it should be clear that this was done without my permission and without Raymond Franz. Since the special files to be viewed on the Internet I did and I spent my money for it, the rest added in YouTube interviews are simply a blatant theft of property.

Customers interview posted on YouTube without permission not only have shamelessly stolen, but the blatantly manipulated by assigning bad motives to Raymond Franz and discrediting your good name with the sole purpose of causing confusion. However, any unbiased person can see the interview to see how unfounded were the suspicions and accusations with which the interview was handled. First, anyone who knows a little of Raymond Franz knows that he never called "sect" Jehovah's Witnesses nor speak of them as derogatory way as is done in some forums and blogs on the internet. Just need a bit familiar with their books to understand the tone and content that their most fervent desire is to help thinking.

I sincerely believe it was necessary to say this so that more readers can have a clearer picture of everything that is involved. There are behaviors and procedures that I will never understand. I just hope that eventually common sense and respect for others first in a medium, the Internet, where it sometimes seems that absolutely everything is permitted.

Sincerely, Esteban López

Friday, August 8, 2008

Monica Roccaforte Dailymotion

Who governs the will of Jehovah's Witnesses?


song "Tell me the truth"


thousand times I wonder who rules my life , who runs

my mind with that of others.

What powers in the shadow
play with my will,

appoints a machine so that we control.

Tell me the truth,
tell his secret.
whole truth,
not be afraid. We

puppets,
other movers and shakers.
not removed the mask,
not know how they are.

They use the words
only to confuse.
I do not know if
hope will survive.

Who rules my life, who dominates my will?
Tell me the truth, the whole truth, not be afraid!


Who governs the life of a Jehovah's Witness, who dominates his will? This article is only intended to tell "the truth", the whole truth ... Does God, Jesus Christ, the Bible perhaps? Any lawyer, economist or just any knowledgeable person would say that an "ecclesiastical Governing Body." However, a Jehovah's Witness base (TJ from here) might answer this:
On one occasion, Jesus said, "[not] expect people to treat them as leaders, because I, the Messiah, I am his sole leader" (Matthew 23:10, Translation Current language). With these words made it clear to his disciples on earth would not have any human leader. His only leader would be in heaven, namely Jesus Christ himself, who has held this position by divine appointment. Indeed, Lord "raised Him from the dead [...] and made him head over all things in the congregation, which is his body" (Ephesians 1:20-23).
But quite another to dictate what their rules:
  • First,
    in their statutes are defined as a "religious institution" [English] called "Jehovah's Christian Witnesses" (TCDJ)

  • Second,
    that this entity is not governed primarily by Jesus Christ and God, and therefore according to the rules written in the Bible, but by their statutes. According to Article first TTJT are under the direction of its Governing Body Church " (from here CG). And in relation to other foreign TTJJ say "The entity has close links with TTJJ and other legal entities of the same faith, both in Spain and in foreign countries that operate under the direction of the ecclesiastical Governing Body. " In conclusion: For legal purposes, the TTJJ are a transnational religious entity (or multinational) with governance structure of the type hierarchy.

    Although the Holy Scriptures claim that base their doctrines and organization, as the first article of its status as the Bible is relegated to the background: "The members of this organization shall be baptized Jehovah's Witnesses ( Note that it says "Christians"), living in harmony with the Scriptures and the doctrines and organization that sets the ecclesiastical Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses and are active (defined as regularly this religious denomination) in any congregation, assignment, mission or religious function of the Jehovah's Witnesses in Spain " .

    Note that the CG will veto the individual's conscience when deciding what activity (Christian and spiritual)
Article 1
of the statutes of the Bank English religious
Jehovah's Christian Witnesses


should clarify that with the exception of senior officials, most unknown TTJJ supracitados statutes and, if asked about it, answer "as automatons, that their leaders are not human but are Jehovah and Jesus Christ who really govern their lives. It is possible that if you offer them a copy of the statutes, they would be rejected and possibly allude to those documents come from "enemies of the people of the Lord" (commonly called "apostates", and according to them these foes are sinners deserving of death which pardon is not granted any).



Photo of directors of the Watchtower Society.

Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses (August 2005)

Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses (January 1992)

Governing Body Jehovah's Witnesses (1975)

Directors of the Watchtower, 1917 (approximately)
Above: (left to right) JA Bohnet, RJ Martin, Giovanni DeCecco, FH Robinson, CJ Woodworth

Below: AHMacMillan, JFRutherford, WE. VanAmburg


Sources:
  1. The Watchtower, April 1, 2007, page 21, paragraph 1,
    Article: Let loyal to Christ and his faithful slave .